Easy2Siksha

GNDU Question Paper-2023

M.A I

Semester

English Novel (Upto:19

Century)

Time Allowed: Three Hours Maximum Marks: 80

Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The

Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.

SECTION-A

1. Fielding describes Joseph Andrews as a "comic epic poem in prose". Elucidate giving

examples.

2. The character of Joseph has not elaborately been drawn by Fielding because Fielding

had to pay more attention to his portrayal of Adams.

SECTION-B

3. Explore the developing relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy in Pride and

Prejudice.

4. "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good

fortune, must be in want of a wife". Does the novel Pride and Prejudice fulfil the claims of

the statement?

Easy2Siksha

SECTION-C

5. Why is it significant for the novel Hard Times to open in the classroom

of Facts and conclude in the circus of Fancy? 6. Sparsit is a fairly minor character in Hard

Times. What themes does she illustrate? Why is she important in terms of plot

development?

SECTION-D

7. Write an essay on The Conflict between the Ideal and the Social in Thomas Hardy's Jude

the Obscure.

8. In Hardy's presentation the Little Father Time an artistic success in Jude the Obscure?

Easy2Siksha

GNDU Answer Paper-2023

M.A I

Semester

English Novel(Upto 19

Century)

Time Allowed: Three Hours Maximum Marks: 80

Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The

Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.

SECTION-A

1. Fielding describes Joseph Andrews as a "comic epic poem in prose". Elucidate giving

examples.

Ans: Henry Fielding's Joseph Andrews, published in 1742, is often referred to as a "comic epic poem

in prose." This description highlights its blend of comedy and epic narrative style, which can be

understood through its structure, themes, characters, and social commentary. Let’s explore this

characterization in simple words and give examples to illustrate these points.

Overview of Joseph Andrews

Joseph Andrews tells the story of a young man named Joseph, who is the servant of the

wealthy and lustful lady, Lady Booby. The plot kicks off when Lady Booby tries to seduce

Joseph, who remains steadfast in his love for his true love, Fanny Goodwill. The novel

follows Joseph’s adventures and misadventures as he travels to London, encountering a

variety of characters, both virtuous and corrupt, along the way.

Comic Elements

1. Humor and Satire: One of the defining features of a comic epic is its use of humor.

Fielding employs various types of comedy throughout the novel. For example:

o Situational Comedy: The misunderstandings and absurd situations Joseph

finds himself in create humor. For instance, when Joseph is mistaken for a

highwayman, it leads to comical interactions that highlight the foolishness of

the characters involved.

o Character Comedy: Fielding presents a range of eccentric characters, such as

the pompous Mr. Abraham Adams, whose clumsy attempts to be heroic lead

Easy2Siksha

to humorous outcomes. His naivety and lack of awareness provide comedic

relief while also serving as a critique of society.

2. Parody of the Epic Genre: Fielding parodies the conventions of epic literature.

Traditional epics, like those by Homer or Virgil, often focus on grand themes of

heroism and honor. In contrast, Joseph Andrews humorously portrays the mundane

struggles of its characters. Joseph’s journey is not about fighting battles or seeking

glory; instead, it revolves around everyday issues, like love and fidelity. For example,

rather than slaying monsters, Joseph faces challenges like getting food and finding

shelter.

3. Exaggeration and Hyperbole: The use of exaggeration is a common comedic device.

Characters are often depicted in larger-than-life ways, which adds to the humor. For

instance, Lady Booby’s obsessive desire for Joseph is portrayed in a hyperbolic

manner, illustrating her ridiculousness.

Epic Elements

1. Heroic Journey: While the novel is comedic, it still follows the structure of an epic

journey. Joseph embarks on a quest that tests his character and resolve. This mirrors

the traditional hero’s journey found in epics. Joseph’s determination to remain

virtuous in the face of temptation and adversity reflects the qualities of an epic hero,

albeit in a comical context.

2. Social Commentary: Epic works often include commentary on society and moral

values. Similarly, Joseph Andrews critiques the social norms and hypocrisies of 18th-

century England. Through Joseph’s encounters with various characters, Fielding

explores themes of virtue, morality, and the flaws in the class system. For instance,

the novel criticizes the pretentiousness of the upper classes while celebrating the

honesty and goodness of the lower classes.

3. Narrative Style: Fielding’s narrative style also aligns with the epic tradition. He

employs a third-person omniscient narrator who provides insights into the

characters’ thoughts and motivations. This allows the reader to engage with the

story on a deeper level. For example, the narrator often interjects with humorous

comments or reflections on the action, adding another layer to the storytelling.

Characterization

1. Joseph Andrews: Joseph embodies the qualities of the epic hero. He is virtuous,

honorable, and steadfast in his love for Fanny. His journey represents the struggle

between good and evil, which is a common theme in epic literature. Despite the

trials he faces, Joseph remains true to his values.

2. Fanny Goodwill: Fanny represents the ideal woman in the novel—faithful, virtuous,

and loving. Her relationship with Joseph serves as a contrast to the superficial and

immoral pursuits of characters like Lady Booby. Fanny’s loyalty and strength

highlight the theme of true love against the backdrop of societal corruption.

Easy2Siksha

3. Supporting Characters: Fielding populates the narrative with a colorful cast of

supporting characters, each representing different aspects of society. Characters like

Mr. Adams, who embodies the foolishness of the clergy, and the various

highwaymen and innkeepers Joseph encounters provide insight into the social

landscape of the time. Through these characters, Fielding satirizes the flaws and

vices of society.

Themes

1. Love and Fidelity: At its core, Joseph Andrews is a story about love—specifically, the

fidelity of Joseph and Fanny to each other. Their unwavering love serves as a

counterpoint to the deceit and seduction practiced by others in the novel. This

theme is essential in both epic narratives and comedies, as it drives the plot and

character motivations.

2. Social Class and Morality: Fielding critiques the social hierarchy of his time. The

upper classes, represented by characters like Lady Booby, are often depicted as

corrupt and hypocritical. In contrast, the lower classes, like Joseph and Fanny,

embody virtue and integrity. This inversion of the typical class narrative challenges

the reader’s assumptions about morality and social status.

3. The Nature of Heroism: The novel redefines what it means to be a hero. Joseph's

heroism is not measured by grand deeds but by his moral choices and steadfastness

in the face of temptation. This idea contrasts with traditional epics, where heroes

are often defined by their physical prowess or military victories.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Fielding's Joseph Andrews is aptly described as a "comic epic poem in prose"

due to its combination of humor, social commentary, and an epic journey. Through its

characters, themes, and narrative style, the novel presents a unique perspective on the

human experience, blending comedic elements with serious critiques of society. By

understanding these aspects, readers can appreciate how Fielding skillfully navigates the

boundaries of comedy and epic literature, creating a work that is both entertaining and

thought-provoking.

Easy2Siksha

2. The character of Joseph has not elaborately been drawn by Fielding because Fielding

had to pay more attention to his portrayal of Adams.

Ans: In Henry Fielding's novel "Joseph Andrews," the character of Joseph is not as fully

developed or complex as the character of Parson Adams. This is mainly because Fielding

chose to focus more of his attention and effort on creating a rich, detailed portrayal of

Adams.

1. The role of Joseph in the story: Joseph Andrews is technically the main character of

the novel - it's even named after him! He's a handsome, virtuous young man who

goes on a journey and faces various challenges. However, despite being the title

character, Joseph often takes a backseat to Parson Adams in terms of character

development and memorable moments.

Think of Joseph as the straight man in a comedy duo. He's there to move the plot forward

and to be a contrast to the more colorful characters around him. His simple goodness and

naivety provide opportunities for Fielding to create humorous situations, but Joseph himself

isn't usually the source of the humor.

2. The complexity of Parson Adams: On the other hand, Parson Adams is a much more

complex and interesting character. He's a country clergyman who is kind-hearted,

well-meaning, and deeply moral, but also naive about the ways of the world. This

combination makes him both admirable and ridiculous at times.

Adams is full of contradictions that make him feel like a real person. He's very learned in

classical literature but often clueless about practical matters. He preaches Christian virtues

but can be quick to anger and get into physical fights. He's generous to a fault but also

sometimes oblivious to the needs of others.

These contradictions and quirks make Adams a much richer character to explore. Fielding

clearly had a lot of fun writing Adams and probably found that he had more to say about

this character than about Joseph.

3. Fielding's satirical goals: It's important to remember that "Joseph Andrews" is not

just a straightforward adventure story - it's a satire. Fielding was using his novel to

poke fun at the society of his time and at other literary works, especially Samuel

Richardson's novel "Pamela."

Parson Adams serves Fielding's satirical purposes better than Joseph does. Through Adams,

Fielding can comment on religion, education, literature, and social manners. Adams'

misadventures and misunderstandings allow Fielding to highlight the gap between ideals

and reality in 18th-century English society.

Joseph, being younger and less educated, doesn't provide as many opportunities for this

kind of social commentary. His main role in the satire is to be a male version of Pamela (the

heroine of Richardson's novel), which Fielding uses to mock what he saw as the unrealistic

virtue of Richardson's characters.

Easy2Siksha

4. The nature of the story: "Joseph Andrews" is often described as a picaresque novel.

This type of story follows the adventures of a roguish hero (or in this case, a virtuous

hero) as he travels around, meeting different people and getting into various

scrapes.

In this kind of story, it's common for the main character to be somewhat bland or generic,

serving more as a vehicle for the plot than as a fully-realized individual. The colorful

characters they meet along the way often steal the show.

This is exactly what happens with Joseph and Adams. Joseph's journey provides the

structure for the story, but it's Adams who brings the energy and entertainment value to

their adventures.

5. Character development vs. plot function: When we talk about a character being

"elaborately drawn," we're usually referring to how much depth and detail the

author gives to that character's personality, motivations, and inner life. Joseph,

despite being the main character, doesn't get much of this kind of development.

We know that Joseph is handsome, virtuous, and devoted to his sweetheart Fanny. But

beyond these basic traits, we don't get much insight into his thoughts and feelings. He often

seems to react to events rather than driving them.

Adams, on the other hand, gets much more attention from Fielding. We learn about his

background, his opinions on various topics, his strengths and weaknesses. Fielding takes the

time to show us how Adams thinks and why he acts the way he does.

6. The entertainment value: Let's be honest - Parson Adams is simply more fun to read

about than Joseph. His misadventures are often hilarious, and his mix of book

learning and real-world naivety leads to many entertaining situations.

Joseph, being young and virtuous, doesn't provide as many opportunities for comedy. He's

often in the role of the straight man, reacting to the chaos around him rather than causing

it.

Fielding was a skilled writer who understood the importance of keeping his readers

engaged. It's likely that he realized early on that Adams was a character who could really

capture the reader's attention, so he chose to focus more on developing this character.

7. The balance of the novel: While Joseph may not be as fully developed as Adams, it's

important to note that this imbalance actually works in favor of the novel as a whole.

If both characters were equally complex and demanding of attention, they might

have ended up competing with each other and muddying the focus of the story.

By keeping Joseph relatively simple, Fielding allows Adams to shine without overshadowing

the nominal hero of the story. Joseph's straightforward goodness provides a steady

backdrop against which Adams' more colorful personality can stand out.

Easy2Siksha

8. Fielding's writing style: Henry Fielding was known for his witty, satirical style and his

ability to create memorable characters. In Parson Adams, he found a character that

perfectly suited his strengths as a writer.

Adams' combination of book learning and worldly innocence gave Fielding plenty of

opportunities to showcase his wit and his knowledge of classical literature. The parson's

misadventures allowed Fielding to indulge in the kind of broad, physical comedy he enjoyed.

Joseph, being a more conventional hero, didn't provide as many opportunities for Fielding

to flex his satirical muscles. This might be another reason why Fielding chose to focus more

on developing Adams' character.

9. The influence of other literary works: As mentioned earlier, "Joseph Andrews" was

partly written as a parody of Samuel Richardson's "Pamela." In that novel, the

heroine Pamela is a paragon of virtue who resists the advances of her employer.

Joseph is introduced as Pamela's brother and shares her unyielding virtue. By making Joseph

a relatively flat character, Fielding may have been poking fun at what he saw as the

unrealistic and one-dimensional nature of Richardson's characters.

Parson Adams, on the other hand, is entirely Fielding's own creation. This gave him more

freedom to develop Adams as he saw fit, without the constraints of parodying another

author's work.

10. The role of supporting characters: In many novels, supporting characters are often

more colorful and memorable than the main character. This is because they don't

have to carry the weight of the entire plot and can be more exaggerated or

eccentric.

In "Joseph Andrews," Adams takes on this role of the scene-stealing supporting character.

While Joseph moves the plot forward, Adams provides much of the novel's humor and social

commentary.

This dynamic is common in many stories - think of Sancho Panza in "Don Quixote" or Sam in

"The Lord of the Rings." These supporting characters often become fan favorites and can

overshadow the main character in readers' memories.

11. The narrative structure: "Joseph Andrews" is told by an omniscient narrator who

often interjects with comments and opinions about the characters and events. This

narrator seems particularly fond of Adams, frequently praising his good qualities and

gently mocking his follies.

This narrative focus on Adams naturally leads to him being more fully developed as a

character. We get more of the narrator's insights into Adams' thoughts and motivations,

which helps to flesh him out as a character.

Joseph, on the other hand, is often described more from the outside. We see his actions and

hear his dialogue, but we get less insight into his inner world.

Easy2Siksha

12. The historical context: In Fielding's time, the novel as a literary form was still

relatively new. Writers were experimenting with different ways of structuring stories

and developing characters.

Fielding's choice to focus more on a supporting character like Adams than on his nominal

hero Joseph was somewhat innovative for its time. This approach helped to establish the

idea that a novel could be more than just a straightforward narrative about a single hero.

By giving so much attention to Adams, Fielding was expanding the possibilities of what a

novel could do and what kind of characters it could explore.

In conclusion, while Joseph Andrews may be the title character of Fielding's novel, it's

Parson Adams who steals the show. Fielding's decision to focus more on developing Adams'

character was likely influenced by a combination of factors: Adams' suitability for satire and

comedy, his alignment with Fielding's strengths as a writer, and his ability to serve the

novel's broader themes and goals.

This imbalance in character development, far from being a flaw, is actually one of the

strengths of "Joseph Andrews." It allows Fielding to create a rich, entertaining story that

works on multiple levels - as an adventure, a comedy, and a satire of 18th-century English

society.

By keeping Joseph relatively simple and focusing more on Adams, Fielding created a novel

that continues to entertain and intrigue readers nearly 300 years after it was written. The

elaborate portrayal of Adams, contrasted with the more straightforward character of

Joseph, is a key part of what makes "Joseph Andrews" a classic of English literature.

SECTION-B

3. Explore the developing relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy in Pride and

Prejudice.

Ans: Introduction

Pride and Prejudice, written by Jane Austen and published in 1813, is a novel that revolves

around the themes of love, social class, and the complexities of human relationships. The

relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy serves as the central focus of the

story. Their evolving dynamic showcases the influence of pride, prejudice, and societal

expectations on personal relationships.

Initial Impressions

At the beginning of the novel, Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy have contrasting first impressions of

each other. At the Meryton ball, Mr. Darcy is introduced as a wealthy and handsome man.

However, he soon earns a reputation for being proud and aloof when he refuses to dance

Easy2Siksha

with Elizabeth. This behavior leads Elizabeth to label him as arrogant, and she develops a

strong prejudice against him.

In contrast, Elizabeth is witty, intelligent, and outspoken. Her lively spirit makes her well-

liked by her friends and family. However, her strong prejudices against Darcy cloud her

judgment and hinder her understanding of his character.

The Role of Social Class

One of the significant barriers between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy is social class. Darcy belongs

to the upper class, with substantial wealth and estate, while Elizabeth comes from a lower

social status as the daughter of a country gentleman. This class distinction creates tension,

as Darcy's pride in his social standing makes him feel superior to those he considers beneath

him.

When Mr. Collins, a pompous clergyman and heir to the Bennet estate, proposes to

Elizabeth, Darcy's interest in Elizabeth grows. He admires her intelligence and

independence, which contrast sharply with the docile nature of women from higher social

classes. Despite his initial attraction, Darcy grapples with the implications of marrying

someone of a lower social standing.

The Turning Point: The First Proposal

The relationship between Elizabeth and Darcy reaches a turning point when Darcy proposes

to Elizabeth in Chapter 34. However, this proposal is unlike any typical romantic overture.

Darcy’s proposal is laden with condescension, as he expresses his feelings while

simultaneously highlighting Elizabeth's lower social status. He attempts to justify his

decision to propose by stating that he is willing to overlook the disadvantages of her family.

Elizabeth is taken aback by the proposal, feeling insulted and humiliated. She passionately

rejects him, calling him out on his pride and his role in separating her sister, Jane, from Mr.

Bingley. Elizabeth’s rejection serves as a catalyst for Darcy’s character development. For the

first time, he is forced to confront his flaws and acknowledge how his pride has affected

those around him.

The Change in Darcy

After Elizabeth's rejection, Darcy undergoes a significant transformation. He reflects on her

criticisms and begins to recognize the consequences of his pride. His subsequent actions

demonstrate this change. In a bold move, Darcy writes Elizabeth a letter explaining his

actions regarding Jane and Bingley, as well as revealing the true nature of Wickham's

character.

In this letter, Darcy opens up about his past and his motivations, revealing a more

vulnerable side to his character. This newfound honesty allows Elizabeth to see Darcy in a

different light, prompting her to reassess her earlier judgments about him. Darcy’s

willingness to change and grow as a person becomes evident, setting the stage for their

eventual reconciliation.

Easy2Siksha

Elizabeth’s Changing Perspective

Elizabeth’s perspective on Darcy shifts significantly after reading his letter. She realizes that

her initial judgments were clouded by her pride and prejudice. As she learns more about

Darcy's true character, Elizabeth grapples with her feelings towards him. This internal

conflict showcases Austen’s exploration of self-awareness and the journey towards

understanding others beyond societal labels.

Elizabeth's change in attitude is further compounded by her experiences in Pemberley,

Darcy's estate. When Elizabeth visits Pemberley, she is struck by the beauty of the estate

and the kindness displayed by Darcy's servants. This visit humanizes Darcy in her eyes,

showcasing the depth of his character and the complexity of his personality.

The Climax: The Second Proposal

The relationship between Elizabeth and Darcy culminates in a second proposal, which

occurs in Chapter 58. This time, the proposal is filled with mutual respect and admiration.

Darcy expresses his feelings more openly and sincerely, acknowledging his previous

mistakes and the growth he has experienced.

Elizabeth, having reevaluated her feelings and perceptions, accepts his proposal with joy.

This moment reflects the theme of personal growth and the importance of understanding

and overcoming one's prejudices. Their relationship evolves from one of misunderstanding

and conflict to one based on mutual respect, love, and acceptance.

Conclusion

The developing relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice

serves as a reflection of the broader themes of pride, prejudice, and social class. Their

journey from initial misunderstandings to a deep and meaningful connection highlights the

importance of self-awareness and personal growth in relationships.

Through Elizabeth and Darcy, Austen illustrates that love is not merely a result of social

status or first impressions but a complex interplay of understanding, respect, and the

willingness to grow. Their relationship ultimately embodies the ideals of romance and

partnership, making Pride and Prejudice a timeless exploration of love's true nature.

Easy2Siksha

4. "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good

fortune, must be in want of a wife". Does the novel Pride and Prejudice fulfil the claims of

the statement?

Ans: Introduction

The line "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good

fortune, must be in want of a wife" encapsulates the central theme of Pride and Prejudice.

At its core, this statement reflects societal norms that equate wealth with marital prospects.

The novel explores how these norms influence the characters' lives, particularly focusing on

the relationships between men and women, the role of class, and the quest for love and

happiness.

1. The Importance of Marriage in Regency England

In the context of early 19th-century England, marriage was not merely a romantic union; it

was also a financial arrangement and a means of social mobility. Women, in particular, had

limited options to secure their future. For many, marrying a wealthy man was the most

viable path to financial security and social status. Austen critiques this societal norm by

illustrating how the pursuit of marriage can lead to both absurd and profound outcomes.

2. Characters Representing the Statement

2.1 Mr. Bingley

Mr. Charles Bingley is a wealthy gentleman who embodies the notion that a wealthy single

man is in want of a wife. His arrival in the neighborhood creates a stir among the Bennet

family, especially because he is a suitable match for Jane, the eldest Bennet sister. Bingley’s

initial attraction to Jane reinforces the idea that wealth opens up opportunities for romantic

entanglements.

However, Bingley’s character also highlights the complexities of love and societal

expectations. His attraction to Jane is genuine, but external influences, particularly those

from his sister Caroline and Mr. Darcy, complicate his romantic intentions. Austen suggests

that while Bingley is initially seen as a man in want of a wife, his relationship with Jane

evolves beyond mere social expectation, hinting at the importance of genuine affection in

marriage.

2.2 Mr. Darcy

Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy, another central character, challenges the notion that wealth

automatically leads to happiness in marriage. Initially perceived as proud and aloof, his

character develops throughout the novel. Darcy’s initial proposal to Elizabeth Bennet is

famously rejected because he fails to recognize that love and respect are paramount in a

marriage.

Darcy’s character arc illustrates that wealth does not guarantee understanding or

compatibility. His journey toward humility and self-awareness demonstrates that true love

requires more than financial stability. By the end of the novel, his relationship with Elizabeth

Easy2Siksha

shows that both partners must overcome societal expectations and personal biases to find

true happiness.

3. The Bennet Family Dynamics

The Bennet family, particularly the mother, Mrs. Bennet, epitomizes the societal pressure to

marry off daughters to wealthy suitors. Her obsession with securing advantageous

marriages for her daughters highlights the desperation of women in that era. Each of her

five daughters represents different attitudes toward marriage:

• Jane Bennet is gentle and idealistic, believing in love as the foundation of marriage.

• Elizabeth Bennet, the novel’s protagonist, is intelligent and independent. She

prioritizes love over financial security and resists societal pressure.

• Lydia Bennet is impulsive and naive, representing the risks of marrying for mere

attraction rather than substance. Her elopement with Wickham nearly brings

disgrace to the Bennet family, emphasizing the potential pitfalls of disregarding

societal expectations.

• Mary Bennet is bookish and moralistic, often overlooked in the marriage market due

to her lack of social grace and beauty.

• Kitty Bennet is largely influenced by her younger sister, Lydia, and represents the

potential consequences of following the crowd.

Through these characters, Austen critiques the limited choices available to women and the

various paths they might take in pursuit of marital happiness.

4. Class and Social Status

The novel also examines how class and social status impact relationships and marriage

prospects. Characters like Lady Catherine de Bourgh represent the aristocratic class and its

disdain for the lower gentry. She looks down on Elizabeth, believing her family’s lack of

wealth disqualifies her from being a suitable match for Darcy.

The contrast between characters from different social standings—like Darcy and Elizabeth—

illustrates the barriers that class creates. Elizabeth’s rejection of Darcy’s initial proposal

signifies her unwillingness to compromise her values and self-respect for the sake of wealth

and status.

5. The Role of Women

Austen presents a nuanced view of women’s roles in society. The societal pressure to marry

often leads women to prioritize financial stability over love, as seen in the cases of Charlotte

Lucas and Mrs. Bennet. Charlotte’s pragmatic approach to marriage, marrying Mr. Collins for

security, contrasts sharply with Elizabeth’s more idealistic views.

Charlotte’s decision raises important questions about women’s autonomy and choices.

Austen portrays her as a practical woman who recognizes her limited options in life. This

Easy2Siksha

complexity suggests that the novel does not entirely reject the idea of marrying for security

but instead encourages a balance between affection and practicality.

6. Love Versus Marriage

Ultimately, Pride and Prejudice explores the tension between love and marriage. The novel

suggests that true happiness in marriage arises from mutual respect, understanding, and

genuine affection rather than societal expectations or financial gain.

The relationships in the novel evolve to illustrate this point. Elizabeth and Darcy’s

relationship matures as they overcome their prejudices and misjudgments, leading to a

deeper understanding and love. Their union serves as a counterpoint to more superficial

marriages, emphasizing that the best partnerships are based on equality and mutual

respect.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the statement "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in

possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife" serves as a lens through which to

view the complex relationships and social dynamics in Pride and Prejudice. Austen critiques

the societal norms surrounding marriage, highlighting the importance of love, respect, and

personal values.

Through her rich characters and their varied experiences, Austen reveals the multifaceted

nature of relationships in 19th-century England. The novel ultimately champions the idea

that true happiness in marriage is rooted in genuine affection and mutual understanding

rather than mere financial considerations.

This nuanced exploration makes Pride and Prejudice a timeless classic, still resonant today as

it challenges societal expectations and celebrates the complexities of love and marriage.

SECTION-C

5. Why is it significant for the novel Hard Times to open in the classroomof Facts and

conclude in the circus of Fancy? 6. Sparsit is a fairly minor character in Hard Times. What

themes does she illustrate? Why is she important in terms of plot development?

Ans: The significance of "Hard Times" opening in the classroom and ending in the circus:

The novel "Hard Times" starts in a classroom and ends in a circus. This might seem like a

strange choice, but it's actually very important for understanding what Dickens was trying to

say in his story.

Let's start with the classroom. In the first chapter, we see a school run by Mr. Gradgrind. He

believes that the most important things in life are facts and numbers. He thinks children

Easy2Siksha

should only learn practical information and not use their imagination. The classroom is

described as a very dull and strict place.

Gradgrind says to the teacher: "Now, what I want is Facts. Teach these boys and girls

nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything

else."

• This classroom represents a way of thinking that was becoming popular during

Dickens' time. It's called utilitarianism, which basically means doing what's most

useful and practical. The problem is, this way of thinking doesn't leave room for

things like emotions, creativity, or compassion.

• Now, let's think about the circus. It's the complete opposite of the classroom. The

circus is all about imagination, fun, and doing things that aren't "practical" but make

people happy. It's colorful, exciting, and full of life.

• By ending the book at the circus, Dickens is making a point. He's saying that the

strict, fact-based way of living (like in the classroom) doesn't lead to happiness.

Instead, he suggests that we need both facts and imagination – both the practical

and the fanciful – to live a good life.

• Throughout the story, we see characters struggle because they've been taught to

only care about facts and money. For example, Louisa Gradgrind, who was raised in

this strict way, finds herself unable to feel love or happiness. She says: "I have never

been cheerful since I can remember. I never had that to lose."

• But characters who embrace imagination and emotion, like Sissy Jupe from the

circus, are shown to be much happier and more fulfilled.

• So, by starting in the classroom and ending in the circus, Dickens is taking us on a

journey. He's showing us how a society that only cares about facts and money can

hurt people. And he's suggesting that we need to balance practical knowledge with

creativity and compassion.

• This structure also reflects the journey of some characters in the book. Mr.

Gradgrind, for instance, starts as a firm believer in facts-only education. But by the

end of the story, he realizes how this approach has harmed his own children. He

begins to see the value in things he once dismissed as "fancy."

• Dickens writes about Gradgrind's change: "He had never been a man of strong

imagination; and he had been afraid of it, when he saw it in his daughter. But he

knew now that it was there, and he had to acknowledge it."

• This change in Gradgrind mirrors the book's movement from the rigid classroom to

the lively circus. It's like Dickens is saying that even the strictest person can learn to

appreciate the value of imagination and emotion.

2. The role of Mrs. Sparsit in "Hard Times":

Now, let's talk about Mrs. Sparsit. You're right that she's not one of the main characters, but

she plays an important role in the story and helps Dickens explore some key themes.

Mrs. Sparsit is Mr. Bounderby's housekeeper. Bounderby is a wealthy factory owner who's

always bragging about how he rose from poverty through hard work. Mrs. Sparsit is

Easy2Siksha

interesting because she's from an upper-class background but has fallen on hard times and

now has to work for a living.

Here are some of the themes that Mrs. Sparsit helps to illustrate:

a) Class and Social Status: Mrs. Sparsit is always reminding people that she comes from a

noble family. She says things like, "My lady," referring to herself, even though she's now just

a housekeeper. This shows how important social class was in Victorian England, even when

someone's actual situation had changed.

Dickens uses Mrs. Sparsit to poke fun at people who are obsessed with social status. He

writes: "She had a serpentine way of coming close to Mr. Bounderby when she was on

confidential terms, and of twining herself about his trust, which was not at all disagreeable

to the flavor of his pride."

• b) Hypocrisy: Mrs. Sparsit pretends to be loyal to Bounderby, but she's actually

hoping he'll marry her so she can regain her high social status. This shows how

people might act one way on the surface but have very different motives

underneath.

• c) The Dangers of Gossip and Interference: Mrs. Sparsit spends a lot of time spying

on other characters and spreading gossip. She's particularly interested in Louisa's

(Bounderby's young wife) relationships. Dickens uses this to show how harmful

gossip can be and how it can lead people to jump to wrong conclusions.

There's a funny bit where Dickens describes Mrs. Sparsit imagining Louisa falling down a

metaphorical staircase of shame: "Down, down, down, Mrs. Sparsit saw her, day by day and

hour by hour, down, down, down, on to her final plunge into the pit."

This vivid imagination of Mrs. Sparsit contrasts with the "facts-only" approach that many

characters claim to follow, showing how even those who think they're being rational can get

carried away by their own fantasies.

In terms of plot development, Mrs. Sparsit is important for several reasons:

1. She creates complications: Her spying and gossiping cause problems for other

characters, especially Louisa. This adds tension to the story and moves the plot

forward.

2. She provides comic relief: Some of Mrs. Sparsit's actions and sayings are quite

funny, which helps balance out the serious themes of the book.

3. She reveals information: Through her spying, Mrs. Sparsit uncovers information that

becomes important to the plot, like Louisa's meetings with James Harthouse.

4. She represents opposition to change: Mrs. Sparsit, with her obsession with old

social hierarchies, represents resistance to the social changes happening during the

Industrial Revolution. This adds depth to the book's exploration of social issues.

Easy2Siksha

5. She helps expose Bounderby's lies: Near the end of the book, Mrs. Sparsit plays a

role in revealing that Bounderby has been lying about his humble origins. This is a

key moment in the story, showing how the truth can eventually come out.

Dickens writes: "So, Mr. Bounderby threw on his hat - he always threw it on, as expressing a

man who had been far too busily employed in making himself, to acquire any fashion of

wearing his hat - and with his hands in his pockets, sauntered out into the hall. 'I never wear

gloves,' it was his custom to say. 'I didn't climb up the ladder in them. Shouldn't be so high

up, if I had.'"

This quote shows how Bounderby presents himself, and Mrs. Sparsit's actions help to reveal

the truth behind this facade.

In conclusion, while "Hard Times" is primarily about the conflict between fact and fancy,

characters like Mrs. Sparsit add depth and complexity to this theme. She shows how even

people who think they're being practical can get caught up in their own fantasies and

desires. Her presence in the novel allows Dickens to explore issues of class, hypocrisy, and

the dangers of interfering in others' lives.

The journey from the classroom to the circus, and the various characters we meet along the

way (including Mrs. Sparsit), all contribute to Dickens' overall message: that a balanced life,

appreciating both facts and imagination, is the key to true happiness and a just society.

SECTION-D

7. Write an essay on The Conflict between the Ideal and the Social in Thomas Hardy's Jude

the Obscure.

Ans: Here is the essay:

The Conflict between the Ideal and the Social in Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure

Thomas Hardy's novel Jude the Obscure, published in 1895, tells the story of Jude Fawley, a

working-class man with dreams of becoming a scholar, and his cousin Sue Bridehead.

Throughout the book, Hardy explores the tension between the characters' personal ideals

and desires and the strict social rules and expectations of Victorian society. This essay will

examine how this conflict between the ideal and the social plays out in the novel, looking at

several key themes and aspects of the story.

1. Jude's Academic Aspirations

At the heart of the novel is Jude's burning desire to become a scholar and attend the

university at Christminster (which is based on Oxford). This dream represents Jude's ideal -

his vision of what he wants his life to be. However, Jude quickly discovers that the social

realities of his time make this dream almost impossible to achieve.

Easy2Siksha

Jude comes from a poor, working-class background. In Victorian England, universities were

mainly for the wealthy and well-connected. There was very little opportunity for someone

of Jude's social status to gain admission, no matter how intelligent or hardworking they

might be.

When Jude first arrives in Christminster, he's filled with hope and excitement. He walks

around the city, admiring the college buildings and imagining himself as a student there. But

reality soon sets in. Jude has to work as a stonemason to support himself, leaving little time

for study. When he tries to seek advice from college officials about how he might gain

admission, he's coldly rebuffed.

In one particularly heartbreaking scene, Jude receives a letter from one of the college

masters, bluntly telling him:

"I have read your letter with interest; and, judging from your description of yourself as a

working-man, I venture to think that you will have a much better chance of success in life by

remaining in your own sphere and sticking to your trade than by adopting any other

course."

This moment starkly illustrates the conflict between Jude's ideals and the social realities of

his time. Despite his intelligence and dedication, the rigid class structure of Victorian society

effectively blocks Jude from achieving his dreams.

2. Marriage and Social Expectations

Another major area where we see the conflict between the ideal and the social is in the

realm of marriage and relationships. Both Jude and Sue struggle against the social

expectations surrounding marriage in their society.

Early in the novel, Jude is tricked into marrying Arabella Donn, a local girl who pretends to

be pregnant to trap him into marriage. This marriage is a disaster from the start - Jude and

Arabella have nothing in common, and Jude quickly realizes he's made a terrible mistake.

But in Victorian society, divorce was extremely difficult and socially unacceptable. So Jude

finds himself trapped in an unhappy marriage due to social conventions, unable to pursue

his true desires.

Later, when Jude falls in love with his cousin Sue, they face even more social obstacles. Sue

is already married to Jude's former schoolteacher, Richard Phillotson. Even though Sue is

deeply unhappy in her marriage, divorce is still seen as scandalous. When Sue does

eventually leave Phillotson to live with Jude, they face intense social disapproval and

discrimination.

Jude and Sue's relationship represents their ideal - they are intellectually and emotionally

compatible, and deeply in love. But society views their relationship as immoral and

unacceptable. They struggle to find work and housing because of their "living in sin," and

face constant judgment from others.

Sue, in particular, rebels against the institution of marriage itself. She sees it as a form of

ownership and control, saying:

Easy2Siksha

"I think I should begin to be afraid of you, Jude, the moment you had contracted to cherish

me under a Government stamp, and I was licensed to be loved on the premises by you—

Ugh, how horrible and sordid! Although, as you are, free, I trust you more than any other

man in the world."

Here we see Sue's ideal of a free, equal relationship coming into direct conflict with the

social expectations and legal structures of her time.

3. Religion and Morality

The conflict between personal ideals and social norms is also explored through the theme of

religion and morality in the novel. Both Jude and Sue struggle with the rigid religious beliefs

of their society, which often seem at odds with their own sense of what's right and moral.

Jude initially wants to become a clergyman, seeing it as a path to education and a

respectable profession. But as he studies religious texts, he begins to question many of the

teachings of the Church. He develops his own, more flexible and compassionate moral code,

which often conflicts with the strict rules of Victorian Christianity.

Sue goes even further in rejecting traditional religion. She's portrayed as a free-thinker who

questions everything and refuses to accept ideas just because society says they're true. At

one point, she even cuts up a New Testament and rearranges it in the order she thinks

makes more sense, symbolically rejecting the authority of the Church to dictate morality.

Both Jude and Sue believe in being good and kind to others, but they don't think this

necessarily means following all the rules of society or the Church. This puts them in conflict

with the prevailing moral standards of their time. When they live together unmarried, for

example, they're seen as immoral and sinful by their neighbors, even though they're hurting

no one and are in a loving, committed relationship.

The novel suggests that the rigid religious and moral codes of Victorian society often lead to

more harm than good. For instance, when Sue leaves her husband Phillotson, he's pressured

by society to refuse her request for a divorce, even though he knows she's unhappy and it

would be kinder to let her go. The conflict between personal conscience and social/religious

expectations is a recurring theme throughout the book.

4. Gender Roles and Women's Rights

Another significant area where we see the conflict between ideals and social norms is in the

portrayal of gender roles, particularly through the character of Sue Bridehead. Sue is in

many ways ahead of her time - she's intelligent, independent, and rejects many of the

traditional expectations placed on women in Victorian society.

Sue wants to live on her own terms, to have the same freedoms and opportunities as men.

She works as a teacher and artist, seeks education, and insists on being treated as an

intellectual equal by the men in her life. This is her ideal - to be free, independent, and

equal.

Easy2Siksha

However, Sue constantly bumps up against the social realities of her time. Women in

Victorian England had very limited rights and were expected to be submissive to men. When

Sue leaves her husband, she faces intense social disapproval. When she lives with Jude

unmarried, she struggles to find work because of the scandal.

Sue's character illustrates the emerging feminist ideals of the late 19th century coming into

conflict with the still very patriarchal structure of Victorian society. Her struggles highlight

how difficult it was for women of that time to live according to their own principles when

those principles conflicted with social norms.

5. The Tragedy of Little Father Time

One of the most heartbreaking parts of the novel, which starkly illustrates the conflict

between ideals and social reality, is the story of Little Father Time, Jude's son from his

marriage to Arabella.

Little Father Time (whose real name is Jude) is a somber, precocious child who seems to

understand the harshness of the world from a very young age. When he comes to live with

Jude and Sue, he sees how they struggle because of social disapproval. He hears Sue say

that their poverty and difficulties are because they have too many children.

In a tragic misunderstanding, Little Father Time decides to "help" by killing his half-siblings

and himself, leaving a note that says "Done because we are too menny." This devastating

event shows the terrible consequences that can result from the conflict between ideals and

social realities.

Jude and Sue wanted to live according to their own principles, to love each other freely and

raise a family together. But the constant social pressure, poverty, and disapproval they

faced created an environment of stress and despair that led to this terrible tragedy. The

idealism of the adults collides with the harsh social realities in a way that has devastating

consequences for the innocent children.

6. The Return to Convention

In the aftermath of this tragedy, we see how the relentless pressure of social norms can

eventually wear down even the most idealistic characters. Sue, who had been the most

rebellious against social conventions, has a kind of breakdown. Overwhelmed by guilt and

grief, she turns back to traditional religion and returns to her husband Phillotson.

This return to convention is portrayed as a kind of death of the spirit for Sue. She submits to

a life she doesn't want out of a sense of punishment and duty. Jude describes her as "cowed

and spiritless" in her return to Phillotson. Here we see how the weight of social expectations

can eventually crush personal ideals, especially in the face of tragedy.

Jude, too, finds himself worn down by the constant struggle against society. Near the end of

his life, ill and alone, he reflects:

"Let the day perish wherein I was born, and the night in which it was said, There is a man

child conceived."

Easy2Siksha

This biblical quote reflects Jude's deep disillusionment. His ideals - of education, of free love,

of living according to his own moral code - have all been beaten down by the harsh realities

of his society.

7. Hardy's Critique of Society

Through these characters and their struggles, Hardy presents a powerful critique of

Victorian society. He shows how social norms and expectations can crush individual dreams

and lead to great unhappiness.

Hardy seems to argue that many of society's rules - about class, marriage, religion, and

gender roles - are arbitrary and often harmful. He shows characters who want to live

authentic, meaningful lives according to their own principles, but who are constantly

thwarted by social conventions.

At the same time, Hardy doesn't present an easy solution. The characters who rebel against

society, like Jude and Sue, end up suffering greatly. The novel suggests that going against

social norms requires immense strength and can come at a terrible cost.

By the end of the novel, we're left with a sense of the immense difficulty of living according

to one's ideals in a society that doesn't share those ideals. Hardy seems to be calling for

social change, showing how the rigid structures of Victorian society caused real harm to

individuals.

8. The Role of Education

Education plays a central role in the novel and is another arena where we see the conflict

between ideals and social realities. For Jude, education represents the ideal - a way to

improve himself, to gain knowledge and understanding of the world. He sees learning as

almost sacred, a way to transcend his humble origins.

However, the social realities of Victorian England mean that higher education is largely

closed off to someone of Jude's class. The university system is designed to maintain class

distinctions, not to provide opportunities for social mobility. Jude's inability to access formal

education despite his intelligence and dedication is one of the great tragedies of the novel.

Sue, too, values education highly. She's self-taught and prides herself on her knowledge and

intellectual capabilities. But as a woman, her opportunities for formal education are even

more limited than Jude's. She can work as a teacher of young children, but higher academic

pursuits are largely closed to her because of her gender.

Through these characters, Hardy critiques a society that limits access to education based on

class and gender. He seems to argue that knowledge and learning should be available to all,

regardless of their social status. The conflict between this ideal and the social reality leads to

frustration and unfulfilled potential for both Jude and Sue.

9. The Meaning of the Title

The title "Jude the Obscure" itself speaks to the conflict between ideals and social realities.

Jude aspires to greatness - to be a scholar, to live a life of the mind. But society keeps him

Easy2Siksha

"obscure" - unknown, unrecognized, stuck in a low social position despite his talents and

efforts.

The title encapsulates Jude's tragedy. He has the potential to be so much more, but social

circumstances keep him obscure - both in the sense of being unknown and in the sense of

being kept in the dark, unable to access the light of knowledge he so desperately seeks.

10. Hardy's Writing Style and the Novel's Reception

It's worth noting that the way Hardy wrote "Jude the Obscure" itself represented a conflict

between artistic ideals and social expectations. Hardy's unflinching portrayal of subjects like

sex, marriage, and religion scandalized many readers at the time. The novel was harshly

criticized for being immoral and pessimistic.

The backlash against "Jude the Obscure" was so intense that it contributed to Hardy's

decision to stop writing novels altogether and focus on poetry instead. This real-world

consequence shows how the conflict between ideals (in this case, artistic truth) and social

norms extended beyond the pages of the novel to affect the author's own life and career.

Conclusion

"Jude the Obscure" is a powerful exploration of the conflict between personal ideals and

social realities. Through the struggles of Jude, Sue, and other characters, Hardy shows how

the rigid social structures of Victorian England could crush individual dreams and lead to

great unhappiness.

The novel touches on many aspects of this conflict - class barriers, marriage and divorce,

religion and morality, gender roles, and access to education. In each of these areas, we see

characters trying to live according to their own principles and desires, only to be thwarted

by the unyielding expectations of their society.

Hardy doesn't offer easy answers. The characters who rebel against society suffer greatly,

suggesting that going against social norms requires immense strength and can come at a

terrible cost. At the same time, those who give in to social pressure, like Sue at the end of

the novel, seem to lose their spirit and vitality.

Through this portrayal, Hardy offers a critique of Victorian society, showing how its rigid

structures and expectations could cause real harm to individuals. He seems to be calling for

social change, for a society that allows more freedom for individuals to live according to

their own ideals.

The tragic story of Jude and Sue serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of social

progress. It challenges readers to think about the arbitrary nature of many social rules and

the harm they can cause when they're too rigid or unjust. While the specifics of Victorian

society may be in the past, the broader conflict between individual ideals and social

expectations remains relevant today.

In the end, "Jude the Obscure" is a deeply moving exploration of human dreams and the

social forces that can crush them. It's a call for empathy, for understanding the struggles of

Easy2Siksha

those who don't fit neatly into society's expectations. And it's a reminder of the ongoing

need to critically examine our social structures and strive for a world that allows all

individuals the freedom to pursue their ideals.

8. In Hardy's presentation the Little Father Time an artistic success in Jude the Obscure?

Ans: To start, let's clarify who Little Father Time is and his role in the story:

Little Father Time is a character in Thomas Hardy's novel "Jude the Obscure," published in

1895. He's the son of Jude Fawley (the main character) and his first wife, Arabella. His real

name is actually not given in the book - he's nicknamed "Little Father Time" because of his

unusually serious and old-fashioned demeanor, despite being just a child.

Now, to understand whether Little Father Time is an artistic success, we need to look at a

few things:

1. His role in the story

2. How he's described and portrayed

3. The impact he has on other characters and the plot

4. What he might represent symbolically

5. How readers and critics have responded to him

Let's break these down one by one:

1. Little Father Time's role in the story:

Little Father Time enters the story quite late in the book. He comes to live with Jude and Sue

(Jude's cousin and partner) when he's about 11 years old. Before this, Jude didn't even know

he existed - Arabella had kept his birth a secret.

When he arrives, he's described as a strange, somber child. He doesn't act like a typical kid -

he's very serious and seems to carry the weight of the world on his shoulders. This is where

his nickname comes from - he has the attitude of an old man, or "father time," even though

he's just a little boy.

His presence in the story is relatively brief, but it's incredibly important. He becomes a

catalyst for one of the most tragic events in the novel. Without giving too much away, his

actions lead to a devastating turn of events that changes everything for Jude and Sue.

2. How Little Father Time is described and portrayed:

Hardy's description of Little Father Time is quite striking. Here are some key points:

• He's described as having an "aged" look, with lines on his face that make him seem

much older than he is.

Easy2Siksha

• His eyes are said to be "uncannily wise," again emphasizing this idea of him being an

old soul in a young body.

• He rarely smiles or laughs, which is unusual for a child.

• He speaks in a very mature way, often making observations that seem beyond his

years.

For example, when Jude first meets him, Little Father Time says, "I should like to have some

tea," in a way that's described as "old-fashioned" and "quaint." This isn't how you'd expect a

child to talk.

Hardy also emphasizes the boy's small size and frailness, which contrasts with his mature

demeanor. This creates a kind of unsettling effect - he's physically a child, but mentally

seems much older.

3. The impact of Little Father Time on other characters and the plot:

Little Father Time has a profound impact on the story, despite being present for only a short

time. Here's how he affects the main characters:

• For Jude: Little Father Time represents a connection to his past with Arabella, which

complicates his relationship with Sue. He also brings out Jude's paternal instincts and

sense of responsibility.

• For Sue: She initially welcomes Little Father Time and tries to mother him. However,

his presence adds stress to her already complicated situation with Jude.

• For the other children: Little Father Time doesn't relate well to Jude and Sue's

younger children. His seriousness and lack of playfulness set him apart.

As for the plot, Little Father Time's actions lead to a major turning point in the story.

Without revealing too much, his presence and the tragedy he causes force Jude and Sue to

confront the harsh realities of their unconventional lifestyle and the judgments of society.

4. What Little Father Time might represent symbolically:

In literature, characters often represent larger ideas or themes. Little Father Time is no

exception. Here are some interpretations of what he might symbolize:

• The weight of societal expectations: His seriousness and "aged" appearance could

represent how societal norms and judgments can weigh heavily even on children.

• The consequences of past actions: As Jude's son from his first marriage, Little Father

Time embodies the idea that our past decisions continue to affect our present.

• The harshness of life: His gloomy outlook and tragic actions might symbolize the

cruel realities of existence that Hardy often explored in his works.

• Time itself: His nickname directly links him to the concept of time. In the story, he

seems to bring about the end of Jude and Sue's happiness more quickly than natural

time would have.

Easy2Siksha

• The death of innocence: Little Father Time never seems to have had a real

childhood. This could represent how harsh circumstances can rob people (and

society) of innocence and joy.

5. How readers and critics have responded to Little Father Time:

Reactions to Little Father Time have been mixed over the years:

• Some readers find him a powerful and haunting character. His brief appearance

leaves a lasting impression, and the tragedy he causes is often cited as one of the

most shocking moments in Victorian literature.

• Others have criticized him as being unrealistic or overly symbolic. Some argue that

his character is too exaggerated to be believable.

• Many critics see Little Father Time as a crucial element in Hardy's critique of

Victorian society. His presence and actions highlight the suffering caused by rigid

social norms and judgments.

• Some readers find him disturbing or unsettling, which could be seen as a success on

Hardy's part if that was his intention.

Now, let's consider whether Little Father Time can be considered an artistic success:

Arguments for Little Father Time being an artistic success:

1. Memorable and impactful: Even though he's only in the story briefly, Little Father

Time leaves a lasting impression on readers. He's often one of the most remembered

characters from the book.

2. Symbolically rich: As we discussed earlier, Little Father Time can be interpreted in

many ways. This depth of meaning is often seen as a mark of good literary character

creation.

3. Drives the plot: His actions are crucial to the story's development. Without him, the

novel's climax and ending would be very different.

4. Emphasizes themes: Little Father Time reinforces many of the book's main themes,

such as the harshness of life, the weight of society's judgments, and the

consequences of unconventional choices.

5. Creates emotional response: Whether readers find him sympathetic, disturbing, or

tragic, Little Father Time tends to evoke strong feelings. This emotional engagement

is often a sign of effective character writing.

6. Unique and memorable: The concept of a child who seems like an old man is striking

and unusual. It's an image that tends to stick with readers.

Easy2Siksha

Arguments against Little Father Time being an artistic success:

1. Potentially unrealistic: Some readers and critics find Little Father Time too

exaggerated to be believable. They argue that no child would really act or speak the

way he does.

2. Could be seen as a plot device: There's an argument that Little Father Time exists

mainly to cause the tragic turn in the story, rather than being a fully developed

character in his own right.

3. Limited development: Because he's only in the story briefly, we don't get to see

much growth or change in Little Father Time. Some might argue this makes him less

successful as a character.

4. Possibly too symbolic: There's a fine line between a character being symbolically

rich and being too obviously symbolic. Some might feel Little Father Time crosses

this line.

5. Potential melodrama: The tragedy caused by Little Father Time is extremely

dramatic. Some readers might find this overly sensational or melodramatic.

My opinion:

Considering all these points, I believe that Little Father Time can be considered an artistic

success in "Jude the Obscure." Here's why:

1. Effectiveness: Despite his brief appearance, Little Father Time serves his purpose in

the story extremely well. He drives the plot forward, reinforces the book's themes,

and creates a powerful emotional impact.

2. Memorability: The fact that this character is so often remembered and discussed,

even though he's not a main character, speaks to Hardy's skill in creating him.

3. Symbolic depth: The multiple layers of meaning that can be read into Little Father

Time add richness to the novel. This complexity is often a hallmark of successful

literary characters.

4. Fit with the novel's style: "Jude the Obscure" is known for its bleakness and its

critique of Victorian society. Little Father Time, with his gloomy outlook and tragic

actions, fits perfectly with this tone.

5. Impact on other characters: The way Little Father Time affects Jude and Sue helps us

understand these main characters better. This is another sign of a well-crafted

supporting character.

6. Historical context: In the context of Victorian literature, Little Father Time

represents a bold creative choice. He's unlike typical child characters of the time,

which adds to the novel's overall impact and originality.

It's worth noting that whether a character is an "artistic success" can be subjective. Different

readers and critics might have different opinions. However, based on Little Father Time's

Easy2Siksha

impact, memorability, and how well he serves the novel's themes and plot, I believe he can

be considered a successful artistic creation.

To conclude, Little Father Time, despite being a minor character in terms of his time on the

page, plays a major role in "Jude the Obscure." His unique characteristics, the way he

embodies the novel's themes, and his crucial role in the plot all contribute to making him an

artistically successful element of the book.

His character pushes the boundaries of realism, venturing into a more symbolic or

allegorical realm. This fits with Hardy's style in "Jude the Obscure," which often blends

realism with more symbolic or fatalistic elements.

Little Father Time serves as a powerful tool for Hardy to critique Victorian society and its

treatment of those who don't conform to its norms. Through this character, Hardy is able to

dramatically illustrate the devastating effects of societal pressure and judgment.

While some readers might find Little Father Time too exaggerated or symbolic to be

realistic, it's important to remember that realism isn't always the main goal in literature.

Sometimes, characters who are larger than life or who represent ideas more than realistic

individuals can be very effective in conveying an author's message or themes.

In the end, the fact that Little Father Time continues to provoke discussion and analysis

more than a century after the book was published is perhaps the strongest argument for his

artistic success. He remains a haunting, thought-provoking character who plays a crucial role

in one of Thomas Hardy's most famous and controversial novels.

Note: This Answer Paper is totally Solved by Ai (Artificial Intelligence) So if You find Any Error Or Mistake . Give us a

Feedback related Error , We will Definitely Try To solve this Problem Or Error